SharePoint Online is where enterprise content lives — documents, records, intranets, team sites, and the collaboration backbone behind Teams. When it is well-architected, it is invisible: people find what they need, permissions make sense, and content has an owner and a lifecycle. When it is not, it becomes the organization's junk drawer: thousands of sites nobody owns, permissions nobody can explain, and content nobody trusts.
HarjTech designs, cleans up, migrates, and governs SharePoint estates. That means information architecture built around how people actually work — hub structure, metadata, navigation, permissions — not a copy of a folder hierarchy from a decade ago. It means migration done as modernization: inventory, triage, cleanup before the move, and validation after every wave.
And it means governance that survives the project: provisioning, ownership, lifecycle, and review routines your team can run. SharePoint is the foundation of the Microsoft content estate. When the foundation is sound, everything built on it — Teams, Copilot, Power Platform — works better.
Left ungoverned, the cost shows up in everyday work and in formal scrutiny alike. Staff lose time searching for the current version across duplicate sites. Teams recreate documents that already exist because they cannot trust what they found. Auditors and legal reviewers face content with no clear owner, retention, or access history. External sharing accumulates without review, and Copilot inherits every permission gap the estate already carries.
HarjTech's approach differs in that architecture is designed from how people actually work, not from the folder structure being replaced. Cleanup and triage happen before migration, so legacy clutter is not carried into the new estate. Governance is installed as an operating rhythm — provisioning, ownership, review, and disposition — rather than a policy document left on a shelf. What the client ends up with is content that is findable, owned, and current, on a foundation the rest of the Microsoft estate can safely build on.
Yes. Migrations run in planned waves with pilot validation, cutover windows the business agrees to, and rollback plans. Content is validated after every wave, and legacy workflows are rebuilt in Power Automate rather than carried forward to break later.
The goal is minimal business disruption — and an estate that is cleaner after the move than it was before it, because cleanup and architecture redesign happen before migration, not after. Book a scoping call to plan your migration.
The disruption risk in a migration is seldom the move itself; it is the content no one triaged. A file share with years of nested folders, or a legacy intranet with pages no one has opened in a long time, carries its clutter into the new estate if it is moved as-is. Cleanup and architecture redesign before migration mean staff arrive in a new estate that is already organised, with validation after every wave confirming nothing was lost. Expect a wave plan your business agrees to, with rollback options. Book a scoping call to plan your migration.
You get the same operating model — prime accountability, senior-led delivery, fixed-scope proposals — without the Big Four rate card or the junior-staff lottery. Every engagement is led at the principal level, and the people in your scoping call are the people who do the work.
We are deliberately focused on the Microsoft stack and the governance around it. Book a scoping call and judge the difference yourself.
The comparison that matters is not firm size but who does the work and how accountability is held. In a large-firm engagement, the scoping conversation and the delivery team can be different people, and SharePoint knowledge can leave when the project team rotates off. HarjTech keeps the same senior people from scoping through delivery, and hands over a governance model the internal team can operate. Expect direct access to the people accountable for the outcome, and documentation your team can use. Book a scoping call and judge the difference yourself.
SharePoint is the content foundation all three sit on. Teams stores its files in SharePoint. Copilot reasons over SharePoint content — which is why permissions and labels matter so much. Power Platform apps read and write SharePoint data. A governed SharePoint estate makes all three safer and more effective; an ungoverned one makes all three riskier.
That is why we treat SharePoint as part of the whole Microsoft estate, not a standalone project. Book a scoping call to assess how your SharePoint estate supports — or undermines — the rest of your stack.
The connection is easy to miss until it causes a problem. A Teams channel creates a SharePoint site; a Copilot answer draws on SharePoint permissions; a Power Platform app reads SharePoint lists. A permission granted casually in one surface propagates to the others. That is why SharePoint governance is treated as part of the whole Microsoft estate, not a standalone project: the same ownership, labelling, and lifecycle rules must hold across every surface that touches the content. Book a scoping call to assess how your SharePoint estate supports — or undermines — the rest of your stack.
Assessments run two to three weeks. Cleanups and remediation packs run two to four weeks depending on estate size. Migrations run two to ten weeks depending on content volume, complexity, and wave count. Every proposal states the timeline explicitly before you commit — and engagements are phased, so you can stop after any phase with a complete, usable deliverable.
Book a scoping call and we will scope your timeline honestly.
Timeline depends on what the assessment finds, which is why proposals state it explicitly before you commit. A compact estate with clear ownership moves faster than one with layered permissions, legacy workflows, and content that has never been triaged. Phasing matters here: assessments complete as standalone deliverables, cleanups run as bounded packs, and migrations proceed wave by wave, so you can stop after any phase with a complete, usable result. Expect an honest scope of your timeline on the scoping call, grounded in your estate rather than a generic estimate.
With an assessment, not a rebuild. The SharePoint Health, Risk & Modernization Assessment inventories your sites, permissions, content, and ownership gaps — then sequences the fixes by business impact. Most estates do not need a rebuild; they need ownership, lifecycle rules, and a cleanup of what is dead.
The assessment tells you which of those applies to you, with evidence, before you commit to a program. Book a scoping call to map out what the assessment would cover for your estate.
The ownership gap usually has a history: a site created for a project that ended, a team that was restructured, an administrator who moved on. Each orphaned site looks harmless alone; together they form an estate no one can defend to an auditor. The assessment maps ownership across the estate and sequences the fixes — assign owners, archive the dead, remediate the exposed — by business impact. Expect a decision-ready picture of your estate, with evidence, before you commit to a program. Book a scoping call to map out what the assessment would cover.
Yes. Modern intranets are built on home sites, hub sites, and communication sites — designed around what employees actually need: news, resources, policies, and a way to find people and content. We design the architecture, build the sites, and hand over the governance so the intranet stays current.
The difference between an intranet people use and one they ignore is usually governance, not design. Book a scoping call to discuss your intranet goals.
An intranet fails when it is treated as a launch event rather than a service. Launch-day design gets attention; the months after decide whether people return. What keeps an intranet current is ownership: someone accountable for each section, a review cadence for news and policies, and navigation that reflects what employees actually look for. HarjTech designs the architecture and builds the sites, then hands over the governance that keeps the intranet current. Book a scoping call to discuss your intranet goals.
By rebuilding them on current needs instead of copying history. We audit access patterns, broken inheritance, and risky sharing links; remediate the priority exposure first; then redesign the permission model — group-based access, hub-level governance, and sharing defaults that make the safe choice the easy choice.
The remediation is sequenced by risk, so the exposures that matter most get fixed first. Book a scoping call for a permissions assessment of your estate.
Permissions exposure often traces to a reasonable decision made years ago: a broad sharing link for a deadline, a site granted to a distribution group that has since grown, a broken inheritance added for one exception and never removed. Auditing access patterns reveals which of these still serve a purpose and which have become exposure. Remediation then rebuilds access on current needs, with group-based permissions and sharing defaults that make the safe choice the straightforward one. Book a scoping call for a permissions assessment of your estate.
Systematically: inventory first, then triage. Inactive and redundant sites are archived, orphaned sites get owners, and the remainder are brought under lifecycle rules — provisioning, ownership, review, disposition — so sprawl stops regenerating.
Sprawl is a governance problem, not a storage problem. The fix is an operating model: who can create sites, who owns them, and what happens when they go quiet. Book a scoping call to find out what your sprawl actually looks like in numbers.
Sprawl at scale is rarely a storage problem. It is many separate decisions — a site created for a meeting, a duplicate for a second team doing similar work — with no lifecycle to close them out. Triage sorts the estate into what is live, what is legacy, and what is duplicative, then applies the right action to each group: archive, assign, or consolidate. The lasting fix is the operating model: who can create sites, who owns them, and what happens when they go quiet. Book a scoping call to find out what your sprawl looks like in numbers.